This is a demo store for testing purposes — no orders shall be fulfilled. Dismiss
Our HPE7-A06 study materials are compiled specially for time-sensitive exam candidates if you are wondering. Eliminating all invaluable questions, we offer HPE7-A06 practice guide with real-environment questions and detailed questions with unreliable prices upon them and guarantee you can master them effectively. As you see on our website, our price of the HPE7-A06 Exam Question is really reasonable and favourable.
Exam4Tests are specialized in providing our customers with the most reliable and accurate HPE7-A06 exam guide and help them pass their HPE7-A06 exams by achieve their satisfied scores. With our HPE7-A06 study materials, your exam will be a piece of cake. We have a lasting and sustainable cooperation with customers who are willing to purchase our HPE7-A06 Actual Exam. We try our best to renovate and update our HPE7-A06 study materials in order to help you fill the knowledge gap during your learning process, thus increasing your confidence and success rate.
>> New HPE7-A06 Test Practice <<
As we know that if you have an outstanding certification you will have more opportunities for application and promotion, many companies think highly of golden certifications, it will be a step-stone to some great positions. Our website Exam4Tests is engaging in providing high-pass-rate HPE7-A06 Exam Guide torrent to help candidates clear HPE7-A06 exam easily and obtain certifications as soon as possible. We are engaging in this line more than 8 years on the HPE7-A06 exam questions. Thousands of candidates choose us and achieve their goal every year.
NEW QUESTION # 65
Ever since a recent firewall change at your WAN/lnternet edge, the 8GP state in your VSX pair has not returned to Established. What should you check to restore BGP functionality at the site?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The BGP state on a VSX pair is stuck (not 'Established') after a recent firewall change at the WAN/Internet edge, where the BGP peering likely occurs.
* BGP and Firewalls:BGP establishes sessions usingTCP port 179. Firewalls located between BGP peers must explicitly permit TCP port 179 traffic bidirectionally for the peering to establish and maintain. Firewall changes are a frequent cause of broken BGP sessions.
* Troubleshooting Steps After Firewall Change:The most logical first step is to verify that the firewall change did not inadvertently block TCP port 179 between the configured BGP neighbor IP addresses.
* Analysis of Options:
* A: Restarting routing service is disruptive and not the first step.
* B: Confirming that appropriate TCP ports (specifically 179) are still allowed through the firewall directly addresses the most probable cause related to the firewall change event.
* C: Restarting NAT service is likely irrelevant unless NAT is incorrectly configured for BGP peers.
* D: Confirming the peer AS is a basic configuration check but less likely related to thefirewall changeevent than port blocking.
* Conclusion:Given the problem occurred immediately following a firewall change, verifying that the firewall still permits TCP port 179 between the BGP peers is the most direct and likely troubleshooting step.
References:BGP protocol specifications (RFC 4271), Firewall management principles, Network troubleshooting methodology. This relates to "Routing" (16%), "Security" (10%), and "Troubleshooting" (10%) objectives.
NEW QUESTION # 66
Acme is having BGP issues with its AOS-CX switch and has asked you to helptroubleshoot the issue You have access to the CLI ofthe switch. Which command can you use to begin troubleshooting?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The question involves troubleshooting BGP issues on an AOS-CX switch, and the task is to identify the appropriate CLI command to begin the troubleshooting process.
* Analysis of Options:
* Option A (show run | route destination):Incorrect syntax; the show running-config command with a filter is not specific to BGP troubleshooting.
* Option B (show debug start):Incorrect; AOS-CX does not use show debug start for initiating debugging.
* Option C (show buffer | debug):Incorrect; this is not a valid AOS-CX command for BGP troubleshooting.
* Option D:Correct. The show debug destinations command displays the current debug settings, including whether BGP debugging is enabled, which is a critical first step in troubleshooting BGP issues.
* Why Option D is Correct:To troubleshoot BGP issues, the first step is to verify if debugging is enabled for BGP events, as this provides detailed logs of session states, messages, and errors. The show debug destinations command on AOS-CX switches shows which debug types (e.g., BGP) are active and where logs are sent (e.g., console, syslog). If BGP debugging is not enabled, the administrator can enable it using debug bgp to capture relevant information, making this the ideal starting point for BGP troubleshooting.
* Relevance to Certification Objectives:
* Troubleshooting (10%):Involves performing advanced troubleshooting of routing protocols like BGP.
* Routing (16%):Includes diagnosing BGP session and configuration issues.
References:
HPE Aruba Networking AOS-CX Configuration Guide: Debugging and Logging, detailing debug commands.
HPE7-A06Study Guide: Covers BGP troubleshooting workflows.
HPE Aruba Networking Technical Documentation: AOS-CX CLI Reference, explaining show debug destinations.
NEW QUESTION # 67
The customer is experiencing periodic uplink congestion between campus-1's AGG-1 and core. This has boon negativelyaffecting voice communications.The VOIP phones edge mark their packets with DSCP EF. The uplink from AGG-1 to core is LAG1.
The customer has already configured the following class and policy on AGG-1:
Based on this policy, which scrip), when deployed on AGG-1. will improve the reliable forwarding of voice trafficbetween AGG-1 and its uplink to the core?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The problem describes uplink congestion affecting VoIP traffic (marked with DSCP EF, value 46) on AGG-
1's LAG1 uplink. The existing configuration classifies this traffic into voip_class and applies voip_policy inbound, setting local-priority 6. To improve reliable forwarding during congestion, VoIP traffic needs strict priority queuing on the egress interface (LAG1).
* Analysis of Options:
* Option A applies a QoS schedule profile globally but doesn't modify the policy's local-priority or apply the schedule profile specifically to the congested LAG.
* Option B modifies voip_policy to set local-priority 7 (mapping DSCP 46 traffic to queue 7) and applies the 8qDwrStrict schedule profile to the egress interface lag 1. In the 8qDwrStrict profile, queue 7 is configured for strict priority, ensuring voice traffic gets precedence over lower-priority traffic during congestion. This aligns with best practices for QoS for VoIP.
* Option C also sets local-priority 7 and applies the schedule profile to lag 1, but the profile itself configures queue 7 with DWRR (Deficit Weighted Round Robin) instead of strict priority, which is less suitable for delay-sensitive voice traffic.
* Option D applies a schedule profile globally and uses DWRR for queue 7.
* Conclusion:Option B is the correct solution because it maps the DSCP EF traffic to the highest local priority (7) and applies a QoS schedule profile to the specific congested uplink (lag 1) that treats queue
7 with strict priority. This ensures voice traffic is prioritized reliably.
References:AOS-CX QoS Guide (specifically sections on Classification, Queuing, Scheduling Profiles, Strict Priority vs. DWRR, applying policies to interfaces/LAGs), DSCP to Queue mapping concepts. This relates to the "Performance Optimization" (6%) and "Connectivity" (9%) objectives.
NEW QUESTION # 68
A customer has configured eBGP peering using local AS 65000 with two routers from a CX 6300 VSF stack with thefollowing switch ports:
[ports connecting to router-1 10.10.10.2]
The LAGs are connected lo third-party L2 switches, which are used as a transit network for the remote eBGP routers. To optimise the possible BGP peering issues. The AOS-CX switch Is configured with theglobal settings:
What needs to be done on the AOS_CX switch to enable the bidirectional forwarding with the eBGP peers?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The goal is to enable Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for eBGP neighbors 10.10.10.2 and
10.10.20.2 on the AOS-CX VSF stack (AS 65000). Global BFD settings are already configured. We need the specific commands to link BFD state to the BGP neighbor relationship.
* BFD for BGP Configuration:Requires enabling the fall-over bfd parameter for the specific neighbor within the router bgp <asn> configuration hierarchy.
* Analyzing the Options (New Image):
* Option 1 (Top):
router bgp 65000
address-family ipv4 unicast
neighbor 10.10.10.2 fall-over bfd
neighbor 10.10.20.2 fall-over bfd
This enables BFD specifically within the ipv4 unicast address family context for both neighbors. This is a valid configuration location.
* Option 2 (Second):
router bgp 65000
neighbor 10.10.10.2 fall-over bfd
neighbor 10.10.20.2 fall-over bfd
This enables BFD directly under the main neighbor <ip> configuration lines within router bgp 65000. This typically applies BFD to all address families configured for that neighbor relationship (including IPv4 unicast). This is also a valid and common configuration location.
* Option 3 (Third):
int 1/1/1-1/1/2, 2/1/1-2/1/2
fall-over-bfd
Incorrect. Applies BFD configuration under an interface range context, which is not how BFD is linked to BGP sessions.
* Option 4 (Bottom):
interface lag1-2
fall-over bfd
Incorrect. Applies BFD configuration under an interface LAG range context, which is not how BFD is linked to BGP sessions.
* Comparing Valid Options (1 vs 2):Both Option 1 and Option 2 correctly use the fall-over bfd command under router bgp. Option 1 provides per-address-family granularity, while Option 2 applies it to the neighbor generally. Without a specific requirement to enable BFDonlyfor IPv4, applying it at the neighbor level (Option 2) is often simpler and sufficient. Both achieve the goal for the required IPv4 peering. In many documentation examples, the configuration is shown at the neighbor level unless per- AF control is explicitly needed.
* Conclusion:Both Option 1 and Option 2 show valid configuration methods. Option 2 is arguably slightly more common/general when BFD is desired for the overall neighbor relationship.
References:AOS-CX BFD Guide, AOS-CX BGP Guide (neighbor commands, fall-over bfd option). This relates to "Routing" (16%) and "Network Resiliency and virtualization" (8%) objectives.
NEW QUESTION # 69
Refer to the four numborod slops in the exhibit.
Which action is the fourthstep in applying a role-to-role ACL on thetraffic from mobile device M1 to roleH2?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The question asks for the fourth step in applying a role-to-role ACL on traffic from a mobile device (M1) to a role (H2) in a network using Dynamic Segmentation with VXLAN. This follows question 17, which identified the first step as the AP forwarding the packet to the gateway.
* Analysis of Options:
* Option A:Correct. The fourth step involves the destination switch (Switch A1) determining the destination role (H2) based on the destination MAC or IP address and applying the role-to-role ACL to permit or deny the traffic.
* Option B:Describes an earlier step (likely second or third) where the gateway forwards traffic over a VXLAN tunnel.
* Option C:Describes the first step, as identified in question 17.
* Option D:Describes an intermediate step (likely third) where the edge switch transfers the Group Policy ID over VXLAN.
* Why Option A is Correct:In HPE Aruba Networking's Dynamic Segmentation architecture, the traffic flow for role-based ACLs in a VXLAN environment follows these steps:
* The AP forwards the packet from M1 to the gateway (question 17).
* The gateway assigns the source role (M1's role) and forwards the packet over a VXLAN tunnel with the Group Policy ID.
* The edge switch transfers the Group Policy ID to the destination switch (A1) via VXLAN.
* Switch A1 determines the destination role (H2) based on the destination MAC or IP address and enforces the role-to-role ACL, as defined in the Group-Based Policy (GBP).
The fourth step is critical for policy enforcement, ensuring that traffic complies with the security policies defined between the source and destination roles, providing secure network segmentation.
* Relevance to Certification Objectives:
* Security (10%):Designing and troubleshooting role-based security policies in customer networks.
* Switching (19%):Implementing Layer 2/3 interconnection technologies like VXLAN for policy enforcement.
* WLAN (9%):Troubleshooting wireless traffic flows in Dynamic Segmentation.
References:
HPE Aruba Networking AOS-10 Configuration Guide: Dynamic Segmentation and VXLAN, detailing role- based policy enforcement.
HPE7-A06Study Guide: Covers Group-Based Policy and Dynamic Segmentation workflows.
HPE Aruba Networking Technical Documentation: Tunneled Node and Role-Based ACLs.
NEW QUESTION # 70
......
To help you prepare well, we offer three formats of our HP HPE7-A06 exam product. These formats include HP HPE7-A06 PDF dumps, Desktop Practice Tests, and web-based HP HPE7-A06 practice test software. Your selection on the riht tool to help your pass the HPE7-A06 Exam and get the according certification matters a lot for the right HPE7-A06 exam braindumps will spread you a lot of time and efforts.
Latest HPE7-A06 Test Materials: https://www.exam4tests.com/HPE7-A06-valid-braindumps.html
HPE7-A06 Online test engine can record the test history and have a performance review, with this function you can have a review of what you have learned, As you can see, HPE7-A06 training material really deserves a lot of credit, since it has a good reputation among the customers indeed, That is to say, the IT examination is still regarded as the only reliable and feasible method which we can take (HPE7-A06 certification training), and other methods are too time- consuming and therefore they are infeasible, thus it is inevitable for IT workers to take part in the IT exam, HP New HPE7-A06 Test Practice There is no doubt that you can get a great grade.
The conventional wisdom was that IT was notoriously bad at delivering HPE7-A06 on brief, on time and on budget, To find and join one of these topic-oriented Groups, you have to search for it.
HPE7-A06 Online Test engine can record the test history and have a performance review, with this function you can have a review of what you have learned, As you can see, HPE7-A06 training material really deserves a lot of credit, since it has a good reputation among the customers indeed.
That is to say, the IT examination is still regarded as the only reliable and feasible method which we can take (HPE7-A06 certification training), and other methods are too time- consuming and New HPE7-A06 Test Practice therefore they are infeasible, thus it is inevitable for IT workers to take part in the IT exam.
There is no doubt that you can get a great grade, Efficient way to gain success.